
Coat of Arms
In his essay Jerusalem and Athens1 Leo Strauss suggests that the vitality of the West is sustained by the unreconciled tension between Biblical revelation and Greek philosophy. This “dual birth” did not just create a cultural heritage; it established the philosophical guardrails that prevent Western politics from sliding into totalizing despotism. By understanding the conflicting demands of these two “cities,” we can uncover the true origins of modern political thought.
The Rejection of the God King
By making the ruler subject to a higher truth whether that truth was God or Reason the West created the first conceptual space for political dissent.
The West emerged when two small traditions on the periphery Jerusalem and Athens simultaneously broke this model, an dared to separate the divine from the political. Both argued that there is a higher truth to which the ruler is subject. In Jerusalem, this was a transcendent God that exists entirely outside of human power; in Athens, it was the nature of things that is independent of any king’s decree. This separation created the first conceptual space for the citizen to judge and if necessary, disobey the state. By making the ruler subject to a higher truth the West created the first conceptual space for political dissent.
The Moral Limit on Power
The Biblical tradition contributes a vertical limit to political power. Because the beginning of wisdom is the fear of the Lord, the ultimate authority is never found in a human institution, but in a Divine Law that predates the state.
- The Root of Constitutionalism: This created the ancestor of modern limited government. If a ruler’s decree violates the moral law (such as the Ten Commandments), the citizen’s primary loyalty remains with the Divine.
- The Root of Realism: This tradition also emphasizes human imperfection and the “fallen” nature of man. In political terms, this informs Conservatism, which views human-led “perfection” with suspicion and prefers a balance of powers to keep human nature in check.
The Sovereignty of Reason
The Greek tradition contributes the concept of Rational Inquiry. Where Jerusalem demands obedience to a law, Athens asked “Why?” based on “Wonder”, and demands an investigation into nature.
- The Root of Democracy: This tradition suggests that justice is not just an inherited custom or a divine decree, but a problem that can be solved through logic and dialogue. This gave birth to the Polis, where citizens use reason to determine the best regime.
- Liberalism and Progress: By valuing the wondering mind, the Athenian root prioritizes the philosopher’s quest for truth, which is the ancestor of modern liberalism, the belief that the individual has a right to use their reason to pursue the truth independently of the state. It is the belief that through education, logic, and the scientific study of society, we can improve our political condition and achieve a more rational state.
The Lowering of the Goals
Modern political movements are essentially secularized versions of these two ancient impulses. When the religious and philosophical origins were stripped away during the Enlightenment, the “energy” of those ideas moved into new forms.
Socialism and utopianism are not continuations of the Jerusalem impulse, but a distortion of it. They take the Biblical hope for a New Jerusalem but remove God, attempting to achieve a perfect society through human engineering and state power. This is essentially a rebellion against the Jerusalem requirement of humble obedience.
Modern Liberalism is not continuations of Athenian wisdom, but a narrowing of it. While Athens sought truth for its own sake, modern ideologies often view reason as a mere tool to conquer nature and produce wealth. The wonder of the Greeks is replaced by the utility.
The Vital Tension
The genius of Western political thought is that neither Jerusalem nor Athens ever successfully defeated the other.2 When a political system tries to be all Jerusalem or all Athens, it becomes brittle and oppressive.
Western liberty is at its strongest when this conflict remains alive. We require the Athenian confidence in human reason to build our institutions, but we also require the Jerusalem humility to remember that we are not gods and that our power must always be limited by a moral law we did not create.
https://www.commentary.org/articles/leo-strauss/jerusalem-and-athens-some-introductory-reflections/ ↩︎
Let that sink in as my official response to Tertullian’s question: “Quid ergo Athenis et Hierosolymis?“ ↩︎